연구보고서
- 저자
- 김대하 박사
- 작성일
- 2017.07.04
- 조회
- 232
- 요약
- 목차
Drought is a recurrent disaster that may exert catastrophic influences on ecosystems, wildlife, and human societies. It is commonly defined as abnormally prolonged deficiency in precipitation that causes a significant hydrological imbalance. However, this conventional precipitation-based definition only considers dry conditions indicated by the lack of water supply, irrespective of water demand. Although the general drought classification includes the socioeconomic drought, which is defined by comparing water supply and demand, the literature that considers water users’ demand in drought assessment is limited. This study addresses this concern with three important issues on drought and climate change in South Korea: (1) future direction of drought risk in climatic observations (i.e., supply-side drought risk) in terms of trends, severity, and spatial extent; (2) differences between a socioeconomic drought in a regulated agricultural watershed and conventional supply-side drought; and (3) impacts of global warming on frequency and magnitude of water scarcity that can trigger extreme socioeconomic droughts in the agricultural watershed. In addressing these issues, high-resolution grid precipitation and temperature data were used to calculate drought indices, to simulate natural inflows in the reservoir, and to estimate the water demand for rice-planting areas supplied by the reservoir. Using the inflow and agricultural demand estimates with a theoretical reservoir operation policy, changes in frequency and severity of water scarcity were assessed in the context of climate change. Results show that trends in the conventional drought indices are unlikely to indicate increasing drought risk, while severity and spatial extent of severe drought areas tend to be intensified and growing. The conventional drought indices and the socioeconomic drought had similar temporal variation when human impacts did not exist. However, they are significantly different when the reservoir operation alters natural flow regime. Additionally, the climate change impact assessment on water scarcity indicated that the regulated river system is more sensitive to changes in long-term averages of precipitation and temperatures than the natural system, despite less climatic risks in the regulated system. The high sensitivity of the regulated system can be increased by augmented reservoir capacity, such that adaptiveness of the system to climate change is expected to rapidly decrease. On the other hand, a non-structural adaptation measure that converts the planting strategy from transplanting to direct sowing, had less sensitivity to climate change than the increasing reservoir capacity.